posted ago by Knollsit [M] ago by Knollsit +130 / -20

Hey all,

First, let's just make one thing clear. Unlike Tucker, we are willing to proudly proclaim with confidence that TRUMP WON.

Now that we've gotten that out of the way, we've noticed some visitors here who seem to have the wrong impression of this site and its purpose, so we'd like to clear up a few things. For a bit of background, we, the mods of r/tucker_carlson, created this site with the help of the good people at thedonald.win months before the election and all the ensuing fallout. It's unfortunate timing that Tucker decided not to fight after the election to stop the steal just as we were truly trying to launch this new .win site, and it really has tarnished his reputation. Trust us, if you're here we probably agree with you. Trump WON the 2020 election, and we are still holding out hope that Republican leadership will grow a spine and affirm the victory Trump had in November.

Since the main .win site was kind enough to plug us we've been getting people coming here in good faith but we've also had some people throwing shade at us for our namesake. We understand their anger, in fact our entire mod team is angry too. We hate the fact that Tucker hasn't gone all out on the fraud, and frankly we're quite perplexed by it. That being said, we still love Tucker because we think he is one of the most intelligent, articulate, anti-establishment voices on the right. He just unfortunately caved/fell silent at the worst possible time.

Like our Reddit sub, we hope this .win site can be a collective "grab all" for paleoconservative/nationalist/America first/right wing news. So welcome. We're happy to have you here.

~ The tuckercarlson.win mod team

Comments (76)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Knollsit [S] 19 points ago +20 / -1

That's actually a great suggestion. I'm going to look into and reach out to the higher ups at .win to see what the possibility of something like that could be. The whole Tucker cucking out thing while we were mid-launch of our new .win was the worst possible timing.

Flipbarryfromreddit 10 points ago +10 / -0

Feels bad man, rip to Tucker’s credibility

shadows_of_the_mind 6 points ago +7 / -1

Crowder had a very good breakdown on Cucker. To summarize, his views blow with the wind, entirely dependent on the outlet he is with at the time and what the higher ups demand he say. Presently at Faux, Tuckman eschews a hybrid of paleocon, neocon, and libertarian talking points, depending on what he’s discussing.

I think a dotwin for paleoconservatism at large would be better than a dotwin for a single media figure. Once faux lets go of the tuckster, who knows where he’ll wind up or how his views shift to mold to their standards

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Knollsit [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good stuff! Let me know if you hear anything back.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0