1
Burritoqueen 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's objecting to adult beverages and addictive substances being promoted in products that make them seem attractive to minors, especially as a substitute to actually dealing with the life problems these substances paper over.

He's especially worried because some people are predisposed towards developing an addiction to pallative substances of any kind.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ooh, another good Kennedy? Seems they're everywhere if you look for them.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker sure isn't falling for the Cuomo sex scandal distraction from the Bring the Virus into the Nursing Homes Scandal.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ooh, one of the more recent Tuckings I forgot about. Maybe it didn't seem like much of a Tucking at the time?

1
Burritoqueen 1 point ago +1 / -0

NBC has three soyboy cuck Tucker knockoffs? No wonder they're Nothing But Crap!

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, any real QAnon theorist would have told these MSM hacks (including Tucker's crew, he's just a MSM hack we like) to get out of their inbox and off their phone.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, please, we're here for Tucker, not his soyboy cuck knockoff on MSNBC.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, if it isn't Mr. Sleepy Eyes himself!

Ooh, Jeb Bush has a lost twin brother? Not quite...

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes you wonder if Andy Kim has any relation to the Kim family in North Korea...

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden Inaguration medals? Sounds like a sort of participation trophy to me...

1
Burritoqueen 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're here, you already know the viewpoint positioned on the left is self-contradictory nonsense with unsustainable proposed "solutions". It's still a popular opinion among leftists.

The viewpoint positioned in the middle (AKA civic nationalism) is the safe and popular opinion among non-leftists. The original author of this infographic would have you believe this position is acually untenable because the original author is promoting race realism, the idea that humans exist as distinct races each with characteristics in common that go beyond skin color.

That brings us to the viewpoint positioned on the right. According to the original infographic author, this is the "correct" position. It argues that most, if not all, members of certain demographics won't ever be capable of any real achievements just because of their ancestry.

If we take this position to its logical conclusion, it raises very uncomfortable questions about what we should do about the various demographics that inhabit these United States. Does this mean we should bring back Jim Crow segregation or even apartheid? Were the Civil Rights Movement and related legislation mistakes? Do we need to ask our neighbors in the "lesser" demographics to leave?

My opinion on this topic is we should acknowlege the facts presented on the race realism side and adopt solutions presented by the civic nationalist side, i.e. addressing issues that impact different groups in different numbers in a colorblind manner. That means violent criminals are treated as violent criminals, slow learners are treated as slow learners, etc. without regard to each person's race or ethnicity; and each individual is expected to be the best he or she can be, regardless of race or ethnicity.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It will turn a lot of conservatives into extremists." ?

Redefining ordinary conservatism as extremism, creating extremists in the traditional sense, or both?

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the upper classes want purpose driven family assistance, and the lower classes want free money to care for their children as they see fit. Got it.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, yet another actual journalist actually fighting for his right to be an actual journalist!

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

"If you don't defend your voters, you don't deserve to be in office."

Does that extend to fraudulent electoral votes, Tuck?

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

VDH here to inform us the MSM propaganda isn't working as well as the MSM is hoping.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's Alex Jones's interview with "Q Shaman": https://banned.video/watch?id=5ff8e6610429ec3746019d3b

Spoiler alert: Alex Jones has been telling his listeners for a long while that the Q movement was a LARP and a net negative to the MAGA movement, and he said so to Q Shaman's face.

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, no, it's Michael Voris's evil twin on my screen!

2
Burritoqueen 2 points ago +2 / -0

That multi-masking graphic is actually based on a misinterpretation of a study that really claims a single three-layered mask was the most effective of the ones tested in the study.

3
Burritoqueen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ooh, a bunch of stuff was prudently left unsaid in that screed against the SPLC.

4
Burritoqueen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Heck, why have an age requirement at all?

Maybe we should change our voting eligibility requirements to reflect a demonstration of actual maturity, e.g. attending school and/or gainfully employed, paying more in taxes than receiving in direct government welfare payments, owning outright or up to date on loan payments for real property, raising children in an intact biological or adoptive family and/or having raised children who meet the other criteria.

Could this cause a problem with miscreants gaming the system? Yes, but it would solve multiple problems too.

3
Burritoqueen 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Let's celebrate the lives and achievements of Black Americans."

"No, not that one!"

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›